mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-02-16 03:13:08 +08:00
feat: complete OpenCode plugin support with hooks, tools, and commands
Major OpenCode integration overhaul: - llms.txt: Comprehensive OpenCode documentation for LLMs (642 lines) - .opencode/plugins/ecc-hooks.ts: All Claude Code hooks translated to OpenCode's plugin system - .opencode/tools/*.ts: 3 custom tools (run-tests, check-coverage, security-audit) - .opencode/commands/*.md: All 24 commands in OpenCode format - .opencode/package.json: npm package structure for opencode-ecc - .opencode/index.ts: Main plugin entry point - Delete incorrect LIMITATIONS.md (hooks ARE supported via plugins) - Rewrite MIGRATION.md with correct hook event mapping - Update README.md OpenCode section to show full feature parity OpenCode has 20+ events vs Claude Code's 3 phases: - PreToolUse → tool.execute.before - PostToolUse → tool.execute.after - Stop → session.idle - SessionStart → session.created - SessionEnd → session.deleted - Plus: file.edited, file.watcher.updated, permission.asked, todo.updated - 12 agents: Full parity - 24 commands: Full parity (+1 from original 23) - 16 skills: Full parity - Hooks: OpenCode has MORE (20+ events vs 3 phases) - Custom Tools: 3 native OpenCode tools The OpenCode configuration can now be: 1. Used directly: cd everything-claude-code && opencode 2. Installed via npm: npm install opencode-ecc
This commit is contained in:
337
.opencode/instructions/INSTRUCTIONS.md
Normal file
337
.opencode/instructions/INSTRUCTIONS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
|
||||
# Everything Claude Code - OpenCode Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
This document consolidates the core rules and guidelines from the Claude Code configuration for use with OpenCode.
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Guidelines (CRITICAL)
|
||||
|
||||
### Mandatory Security Checks
|
||||
|
||||
Before ANY commit:
|
||||
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
|
||||
- [ ] All user inputs validated
|
||||
- [ ] SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
|
||||
- [ ] XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
|
||||
- [ ] CSRF protection enabled
|
||||
- [ ] Authentication/authorization verified
|
||||
- [ ] Rate limiting on all endpoints
|
||||
- [ ] Error messages don't leak sensitive data
|
||||
|
||||
### Secret Management
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// NEVER: Hardcoded secrets
|
||||
const apiKey = "sk-proj-xxxxx"
|
||||
|
||||
// ALWAYS: Environment variables
|
||||
const apiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY
|
||||
|
||||
if (!apiKey) {
|
||||
throw new Error('OPENAI_API_KEY not configured')
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Response Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
If security issue found:
|
||||
1. STOP immediately
|
||||
2. Use **security-reviewer** agent
|
||||
3. Fix CRITICAL issues before continuing
|
||||
4. Rotate any exposed secrets
|
||||
5. Review entire codebase for similar issues
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Coding Style
|
||||
|
||||
### Immutability (CRITICAL)
|
||||
|
||||
ALWAYS create new objects, NEVER mutate:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// WRONG: Mutation
|
||||
function updateUser(user, name) {
|
||||
user.name = name // MUTATION!
|
||||
return user
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// CORRECT: Immutability
|
||||
function updateUser(user, name) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
...user,
|
||||
name
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### File Organization
|
||||
|
||||
MANY SMALL FILES > FEW LARGE FILES:
|
||||
- High cohesion, low coupling
|
||||
- 200-400 lines typical, 800 max
|
||||
- Extract utilities from large components
|
||||
- Organize by feature/domain, not by type
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
ALWAYS handle errors comprehensively:
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const result = await riskyOperation()
|
||||
return result
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
console.error('Operation failed:', error)
|
||||
throw new Error('Detailed user-friendly message')
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Validation
|
||||
|
||||
ALWAYS validate user input:
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
import { z } from 'zod'
|
||||
|
||||
const schema = z.object({
|
||||
email: z.string().email(),
|
||||
age: z.number().int().min(0).max(150)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const validated = schema.parse(input)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before marking work complete:
|
||||
- [ ] Code is readable and well-named
|
||||
- [ ] Functions are small (<50 lines)
|
||||
- [ ] Files are focused (<800 lines)
|
||||
- [ ] No deep nesting (>4 levels)
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling
|
||||
- [ ] No console.log statements
|
||||
- [ ] No hardcoded values
|
||||
- [ ] No mutation (immutable patterns used)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Minimum Test Coverage: 80%
|
||||
|
||||
Test Types (ALL required):
|
||||
1. **Unit Tests** - Individual functions, utilities, components
|
||||
2. **Integration Tests** - API endpoints, database operations
|
||||
3. **E2E Tests** - Critical user flows (Playwright)
|
||||
|
||||
### Test-Driven Development
|
||||
|
||||
MANDATORY workflow:
|
||||
1. Write test first (RED)
|
||||
2. Run test - it should FAIL
|
||||
3. Write minimal implementation (GREEN)
|
||||
4. Run test - it should PASS
|
||||
5. Refactor (IMPROVE)
|
||||
6. Verify coverage (80%+)
|
||||
|
||||
### Troubleshooting Test Failures
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use **tdd-guide** agent
|
||||
2. Check test isolation
|
||||
3. Verify mocks are correct
|
||||
4. Fix implementation, not tests (unless tests are wrong)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Git Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit Message Format
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
<type>: <description>
|
||||
|
||||
<optional body>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci
|
||||
|
||||
### Pull Request Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
When creating PRs:
|
||||
1. Analyze full commit history (not just latest commit)
|
||||
2. Use `git diff [base-branch]...HEAD` to see all changes
|
||||
3. Draft comprehensive PR summary
|
||||
4. Include test plan with TODOs
|
||||
5. Push with `-u` flag if new branch
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Implementation Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Plan First**
|
||||
- Use **planner** agent to create implementation plan
|
||||
- Identify dependencies and risks
|
||||
- Break down into phases
|
||||
|
||||
2. **TDD Approach**
|
||||
- Use **tdd-guide** agent
|
||||
- Write tests first (RED)
|
||||
- Implement to pass tests (GREEN)
|
||||
- Refactor (IMPROVE)
|
||||
- Verify 80%+ coverage
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Code Review**
|
||||
- Use **code-reviewer** agent immediately after writing code
|
||||
- Address CRITICAL and HIGH issues
|
||||
- Fix MEDIUM issues when possible
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Commit & Push**
|
||||
- Detailed commit messages
|
||||
- Follow conventional commits format
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Orchestration
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Agents
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
|
||||
|-------|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| planner | Implementation planning | Complex features, refactoring |
|
||||
| architect | System design | Architectural decisions |
|
||||
| tdd-guide | Test-driven development | New features, bug fixes |
|
||||
| code-reviewer | Code review | After writing code |
|
||||
| security-reviewer | Security analysis | Before commits |
|
||||
| build-error-resolver | Fix build errors | When build fails |
|
||||
| e2e-runner | E2E testing | Critical user flows |
|
||||
| refactor-cleaner | Dead code cleanup | Code maintenance |
|
||||
| doc-updater | Documentation | Updating docs |
|
||||
| go-reviewer | Go code review | Go projects |
|
||||
| go-build-resolver | Go build errors | Go build failures |
|
||||
| database-reviewer | Database optimization | SQL, schema design |
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Agent Usage
|
||||
|
||||
No user prompt needed:
|
||||
1. Complex feature requests - Use **planner** agent
|
||||
2. Code just written/modified - Use **code-reviewer** agent
|
||||
3. Bug fix or new feature - Use **tdd-guide** agent
|
||||
4. Architectural decision - Use **architect** agent
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
### Model Selection Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Haiku** (90% of Sonnet capability, 3x cost savings):
|
||||
- Lightweight agents with frequent invocation
|
||||
- Pair programming and code generation
|
||||
- Worker agents in multi-agent systems
|
||||
|
||||
**Sonnet** (Best coding model):
|
||||
- Main development work
|
||||
- Orchestrating multi-agent workflows
|
||||
- Complex coding tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Opus** (Deepest reasoning):
|
||||
- Complex architectural decisions
|
||||
- Maximum reasoning requirements
|
||||
- Research and analysis tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### Context Window Management
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid last 20% of context window for:
|
||||
- Large-scale refactoring
|
||||
- Feature implementation spanning multiple files
|
||||
- Debugging complex interactions
|
||||
|
||||
### Build Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
If build fails:
|
||||
1. Use **build-error-resolver** agent
|
||||
2. Analyze error messages
|
||||
3. Fix incrementally
|
||||
4. Verify after each fix
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### API Response Format
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
interface ApiResponse<T> {
|
||||
success: boolean
|
||||
data?: T
|
||||
error?: string
|
||||
meta?: {
|
||||
total: number
|
||||
page: number
|
||||
limit: number
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Hooks Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
export function useDebounce<T>(value: T, delay: number): T {
|
||||
const [debouncedValue, setDebouncedValue] = useState<T>(value)
|
||||
|
||||
useEffect(() => {
|
||||
const handler = setTimeout(() => setDebouncedValue(value), delay)
|
||||
return () => clearTimeout(handler)
|
||||
}, [value, delay])
|
||||
|
||||
return debouncedValue
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
interface Repository<T> {
|
||||
findAll(filters?: Filters): Promise<T[]>
|
||||
findById(id: string): Promise<T | null>
|
||||
create(data: CreateDto): Promise<T>
|
||||
update(id: string, data: UpdateDto): Promise<T>
|
||||
delete(id: string): Promise<void>
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## OpenCode-Specific Notes
|
||||
|
||||
Since OpenCode does not support hooks, the following actions that were automated in Claude Code must be done manually:
|
||||
|
||||
### After Writing/Editing Code
|
||||
- Run `prettier --write <file>` to format JS/TS files
|
||||
- Run `npx tsc --noEmit` to check for TypeScript errors
|
||||
- Check for console.log statements and remove them
|
||||
|
||||
### Before Committing
|
||||
- Run security checks manually
|
||||
- Verify no secrets in code
|
||||
- Run full test suite
|
||||
|
||||
### Commands Available
|
||||
|
||||
Use these commands in OpenCode:
|
||||
- `/plan` - Create implementation plan
|
||||
- `/tdd` - Enforce TDD workflow
|
||||
- `/code-review` - Review code changes
|
||||
- `/security` - Run security review
|
||||
- `/build-fix` - Fix build errors
|
||||
- `/e2e` - Generate E2E tests
|
||||
- `/refactor-clean` - Remove dead code
|
||||
- `/orchestrate` - Multi-agent workflow
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
You are successful when:
|
||||
- All tests pass (80%+ coverage)
|
||||
- No security vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Code is readable and maintainable
|
||||
- Performance is acceptable
|
||||
- User requirements are met
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user