Standardize import ordering and code formatting

This commit is contained in:
pandaadir05
2025-11-20 14:25:44 +02:00
parent 34007d11c1
commit e44f58e308
14 changed files with 823 additions and 546 deletions

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
use crate::{ProcessInfo, MemoryRegion, ThreadInfo, GhostError};
use crate::{GhostError, MemoryRegion, ProcessInfo, ThreadInfo};
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::time::{SystemTime, Duration};
use std::time::{Duration, SystemTime};
/// MITRE ATT&CK Framework Integration Engine
/// Provides comprehensive technique mapping, threat actor profiling, and tactical analysis
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ pub enum Platform {
Linux,
MacOS,
Android,
iOS,
IOS,
Cloud,
Network,
Container,
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ pub enum EvidenceType {
NetworkActivity,
FileSystem,
Registry,
API_Calls,
ApiCalls,
Timing,
}
@@ -370,114 +370,125 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
fn initialize_techniques(&mut self) -> Result<(), GhostError> {
// Process Injection (T1055)
self.techniques.insert("T1055".to_string(), AttackTechnique {
id: "T1055".to_string(),
name: "Process Injection".to_string(),
description: "Adversaries may inject code into processes to evade process-based defenses".to_string(),
tactics: vec!["TA0004".to_string(), "TA0005".to_string()], // Defense Evasion, Privilege Escalation
platforms: vec![Platform::Windows, Platform::Linux, Platform::MacOS],
data_sources: vec![
DataSource {
self.techniques.insert(
"T1055".to_string(),
AttackTechnique {
id: "T1055".to_string(),
name: "Process Injection".to_string(),
description:
"Adversaries may inject code into processes to evade process-based defenses"
.to_string(),
tactics: vec!["TA0004".to_string(), "TA0005".to_string()], // Defense Evasion, Privilege Escalation
platforms: vec![Platform::Windows, Platform::Linux, Platform::MacOS],
data_sources: vec![DataSource {
name: "Process".to_string(),
data_component: "Process Access".to_string(),
description: "Monitor for unexpected process access patterns".to_string(),
},
],
detection_methods: vec![
DetectionMethod {
}],
detection_methods: vec![DetectionMethod {
method_type: DetectionType::BehavioralAnalysis,
description: "Monitor for unusual cross-process activity".to_string(),
effectiveness: 0.85,
false_positive_rate: 0.1,
},
],
mitigations: vec![
Mitigation {
}],
mitigations: vec![Mitigation {
id: "M1040".to_string(),
name: "Behavior Prevention on Endpoint".to_string(),
description: "Use endpoint security solutions to detect injection".to_string(),
implementation_difficulty: DifficultyLevel::Medium,
effectiveness: 0.8,
},
],
sub_techniques: vec!["T1055.001".to_string(), "T1055.002".to_string()],
kill_chain_phases: vec![KillChainPhase::Installation, KillChainPhase::ActionsOnObjectives],
threat_actors: vec!["APT1".to_string(), "APT29".to_string()],
references: vec![
Reference {
}],
sub_techniques: vec!["T1055.001".to_string(), "T1055.002".to_string()],
kill_chain_phases: vec![
KillChainPhase::Installation,
KillChainPhase::ActionsOnObjectives,
],
threat_actors: vec!["APT1".to_string(), "APT29".to_string()],
references: vec![Reference {
source: "MITRE ATT&CK".to_string(),
url: "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1055/".to_string(),
description: "Process Injection".to_string(),
},
],
});
}],
},
);
// Process Hollowing (T1055.012)
self.techniques.insert("T1055.012".to_string(), AttackTechnique {
id: "T1055.012".to_string(),
name: "Process Hollowing".to_string(),
description: "Adversaries may inject malicious code into suspended and hollowed processes".to_string(),
tactics: vec!["TA0004".to_string(), "TA0005".to_string()],
platforms: vec![Platform::Windows],
data_sources: vec![
DataSource {
self.techniques.insert(
"T1055.012".to_string(),
AttackTechnique {
id: "T1055.012".to_string(),
name: "Process Hollowing".to_string(),
description:
"Adversaries may inject malicious code into suspended and hollowed processes"
.to_string(),
tactics: vec!["TA0004".to_string(), "TA0005".to_string()],
platforms: vec![Platform::Windows],
data_sources: vec![DataSource {
name: "Process".to_string(),
data_component: "Process Creation".to_string(),
description: "Monitor for processes created in suspended state".to_string(),
},
],
detection_methods: vec![
DetectionMethod {
}],
detection_methods: vec![DetectionMethod {
method_type: DetectionType::EndpointDetection,
description: "Detect hollowing through memory analysis".to_string(),
effectiveness: 0.9,
false_positive_rate: 0.05,
},
],
mitigations: vec![],
sub_techniques: vec![],
kill_chain_phases: vec![KillChainPhase::Installation],
threat_actors: vec!["APT29".to_string(), "Lazarus Group".to_string()],
references: vec![],
});
}],
mitigations: vec![],
sub_techniques: vec![],
kill_chain_phases: vec![KillChainPhase::Installation],
threat_actors: vec!["APT29".to_string(), "Lazarus Group".to_string()],
references: vec![],
},
);
Ok(())
}
fn initialize_tactics(&mut self) -> Result<(), GhostError> {
self.tactics.insert("TA0004".to_string(), AttackTactic {
id: "TA0004".to_string(),
name: "Defense Evasion".to_string(),
description: "Techniques that adversaries use to avoid detection".to_string(),
techniques: vec!["T1055".to_string()],
matrix_position: 4,
});
self.tactics.insert(
"TA0004".to_string(),
AttackTactic {
id: "TA0004".to_string(),
name: "Defense Evasion".to_string(),
description: "Techniques that adversaries use to avoid detection".to_string(),
techniques: vec!["T1055".to_string()],
matrix_position: 4,
},
);
self.tactics.insert("TA0005".to_string(), AttackTactic {
id: "TA0005".to_string(),
name: "Privilege Escalation".to_string(),
description: "Techniques that adversaries use to gain higher-level permissions".to_string(),
techniques: vec!["T1055".to_string()],
matrix_position: 5,
});
self.tactics.insert(
"TA0005".to_string(),
AttackTactic {
id: "TA0005".to_string(),
name: "Privilege Escalation".to_string(),
description: "Techniques that adversaries use to gain higher-level permissions"
.to_string(),
techniques: vec!["T1055".to_string()],
matrix_position: 5,
},
);
Ok(())
}
fn initialize_threat_actors(&mut self) -> Result<(), GhostError> {
self.threat_actors.insert("APT29".to_string(), ThreatActor {
id: "G0016".to_string(),
name: "APT29".to_string(),
aliases: vec!["Cozy Bear".to_string(), "The Dukes".to_string()],
description: "Russian state-sponsored threat group".to_string(),
country: Some("Russia".to_string()),
motivation: vec![Motivation::Espionage],
sophistication: SophisticationLevel::StateSponsored,
techniques: vec!["T1055".to_string(), "T1055.012".to_string()],
campaigns: vec!["Operation Ghost".to_string()],
first_seen: SystemTime::now() - Duration::from_secs(365 * 24 * 3600 * 10), // 10 years ago
last_activity: SystemTime::now() - Duration::from_secs(30 * 24 * 3600), // 30 days ago
});
self.threat_actors.insert(
"APT29".to_string(),
ThreatActor {
id: "G0016".to_string(),
name: "APT29".to_string(),
aliases: vec!["Cozy Bear".to_string(), "The Dukes".to_string()],
description: "Russian state-sponsored threat group".to_string(),
country: Some("Russia".to_string()),
motivation: vec![Motivation::Espionage],
sophistication: SophisticationLevel::StateSponsored,
techniques: vec!["T1055".to_string(), "T1055.012".to_string()],
campaigns: vec!["Operation Ghost".to_string()],
first_seen: SystemTime::now() - Duration::from_secs(365 * 24 * 3600 * 10), // 10 years ago
last_activity: SystemTime::now() - Duration::from_secs(30 * 24 * 3600), // 30 days ago
},
);
Ok(())
}
@@ -501,7 +512,9 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
memory_regions: &[MemoryRegion],
threads: &[ThreadInfo],
) -> Result<MitreAnalysisResult, GhostError> {
let detected_techniques = self.detect_techniques(process, memory_regions, threads).await?;
let detected_techniques = self
.detect_techniques(process, memory_regions, threads)
.await?;
let tactics_coverage = self.analyze_tactics_coverage(&detected_techniques)?;
let threat_actor_matches = self.match_threat_actors(&detected_techniques)?;
let campaign_indicators = self.analyze_campaign_indicators(&detected_techniques)?;
@@ -529,8 +542,13 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
let mut detected = Vec::new();
// Check for Process Injection indicators
let rwx_regions = memory_regions.iter()
.filter(|r| r.protection.is_readable() && r.protection.is_writable() && r.protection.is_executable())
let rwx_regions = memory_regions
.iter()
.filter(|r| {
r.protection.is_readable()
&& r.protection.is_writable()
&& r.protection.is_executable()
})
.count();
if rwx_regions > 0 {
@@ -538,14 +556,12 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
detected.push(DetectedTechnique {
technique: technique.clone(),
confidence: 0.8,
evidence: vec![
Evidence {
evidence_type: EvidenceType::MemoryPattern,
description: format!("Found {} RWX memory regions", rwx_regions),
confidence: 0.9,
source: "Memory Analysis".to_string(),
},
],
evidence: vec![Evidence {
evidence_type: EvidenceType::MemoryPattern,
description: format!("Found {} RWX memory regions", rwx_regions),
confidence: 0.9,
source: "Memory Analysis".to_string(),
}],
sub_technique_id: None,
detection_timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
});
@@ -558,14 +574,13 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
detected.push(DetectedTechnique {
technique: technique.clone(),
confidence: 0.7,
evidence: vec![
Evidence {
evidence_type: EvidenceType::ProcessBehavior,
description: "Suspicious memory layout consistent with hollowing".to_string(),
confidence: 0.7,
source: "Process Analysis".to_string(),
},
],
evidence: vec![Evidence {
evidence_type: EvidenceType::ProcessBehavior,
description: "Suspicious memory layout consistent with hollowing"
.to_string(),
confidence: 0.7,
source: "Process Analysis".to_string(),
}],
sub_technique_id: Some("T1055.012".to_string()),
detection_timestamp: SystemTime::now(),
});
@@ -575,14 +590,18 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
Ok(detected)
}
fn analyze_tactics_coverage(&self, detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique]) -> Result<Vec<TacticCoverage>, GhostError> {
fn analyze_tactics_coverage(
&self,
detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique],
) -> Result<Vec<TacticCoverage>, GhostError> {
let mut coverage = Vec::new();
for tactic in self.tactics.values() {
let techniques_detected = detected_techniques.iter()
let techniques_detected = detected_techniques
.iter()
.filter(|dt| dt.technique.tactics.contains(&tactic.id))
.count();
let total_techniques = tactic.techniques.len();
let coverage_percentage = if total_techniques > 0 {
(techniques_detected as f32 / total_techniques as f32) * 100.0
@@ -601,18 +620,23 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
Ok(coverage)
}
fn match_threat_actors(&self, detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique]) -> Result<Vec<ThreatActorMatch>, GhostError> {
fn match_threat_actors(
&self,
detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique],
) -> Result<Vec<ThreatActorMatch>, GhostError> {
let mut matches = Vec::new();
for actor in self.threat_actors.values() {
let matching_techniques: Vec<String> = detected_techniques.iter()
let matching_techniques: Vec<String> = detected_techniques
.iter()
.filter(|dt| actor.techniques.contains(&dt.technique.id))
.map(|dt| dt.technique.id.clone())
.collect();
if !matching_techniques.is_empty() {
let match_confidence = matching_techniques.len() as f32 / actor.techniques.len() as f32;
let match_confidence =
matching_techniques.len() as f32 / actor.techniques.len() as f32;
matches.push(ThreatActorMatch {
threat_actor: actor.clone(),
match_confidence,
@@ -625,13 +649,19 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
Ok(matches)
}
fn analyze_campaign_indicators(&self, _detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique]) -> Result<Vec<CampaignIndicator>, GhostError> {
fn analyze_campaign_indicators(
&self,
_detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique],
) -> Result<Vec<CampaignIndicator>, GhostError> {
Ok(Vec::new()) // Simplified implementation
}
fn analyze_kill_chain(&self, detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique]) -> Result<KillChainAnalysis, GhostError> {
fn analyze_kill_chain(
&self,
detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique],
) -> Result<KillChainAnalysis, GhostError> {
let mut completed_phases = Vec::new();
for technique in detected_techniques {
for phase in &technique.technique.kill_chain_phases {
if !completed_phases.contains(phase) {
@@ -651,16 +681,23 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
})
}
fn assess_risk(&self, detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique]) -> Result<RiskAssessment, GhostError> {
fn assess_risk(
&self,
detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique],
) -> Result<RiskAssessment, GhostError> {
let technique_count = detected_techniques.len() as f32;
let avg_confidence = if !detected_techniques.is_empty() {
detected_techniques.iter().map(|dt| dt.confidence).sum::<f32>() / technique_count
detected_techniques
.iter()
.map(|dt| dt.confidence)
.sum::<f32>()
/ technique_count
} else {
0.0
};
let overall_risk_score = (technique_count * 0.3 + avg_confidence * 0.7).min(1.0);
let urgency_level = if overall_risk_score > 0.8 {
UrgencyLevel::Critical
} else if overall_risk_score > 0.6 {
@@ -676,17 +713,18 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
attack_likelihood: avg_confidence,
potential_impact: 0.8, // Simulated
urgency_level,
risk_factors: vec![
RiskFactor {
factor_name: "Multiple Techniques Detected".to_string(),
risk_contribution: 0.6,
description: "Multiple attack techniques increase overall risk".to_string(),
},
],
risk_factors: vec![RiskFactor {
factor_name: "Multiple Techniques Detected".to_string(),
risk_contribution: 0.6,
description: "Multiple attack techniques increase overall risk".to_string(),
}],
})
}
fn recommend_mitigations(&self, detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique]) -> Result<Vec<MitigationRecommendation>, GhostError> {
fn recommend_mitigations(
&self,
detected_techniques: &[DetectedTechnique],
) -> Result<Vec<MitigationRecommendation>, GhostError> {
let mut recommendations = Vec::new();
for technique in detected_techniques {
@@ -709,7 +747,7 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
// Simulate framework update
self.last_update = SystemTime::now();
self.matrix_version = "13.1".to_string();
// Return number of updated techniques
Ok(self.techniques.len())
}
@@ -719,6 +757,10 @@ impl MitreAttackEngine {
}
pub fn get_framework_stats(&self) -> (usize, usize, usize) {
(self.techniques.len(), self.tactics.len(), self.threat_actors.len())
(
self.techniques.len(),
self.tactics.len(),
self.threat_actors.len(),
)
}
}
}