fix(firewall): iptables detection with permission denied
This commit is contained in:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ func (cm *cmdMatcher) String() string {
|
||||
return fmt.Sprintf("path %s, argument regular expressions %v", cm.path, cm.argsRegex)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func newCmdMatcher(path string, argsRegex ...string) *cmdMatcher { //nolint:unparam
|
||||
func newCmdMatcher(path string, argsRegex ...string) *cmdMatcher {
|
||||
argsRegexp := make([]*regexp.Regexp, len(argsRegex))
|
||||
for i, argRegex := range argsRegex {
|
||||
argsRegexp[i] = regexp.MustCompile(argRegex)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import (
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"math/rand"
|
||||
"os/exec"
|
||||
"sort"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/qdm12/golibs/command"
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ var (
|
||||
|
||||
func checkIptablesSupport(ctx context.Context, runner command.Runner,
|
||||
iptablesPathsToTry ...string) (iptablesPath string, err error) {
|
||||
var lastUnsupportedMessage string
|
||||
iptablesPathToUnsupportedMessage := make(map[string]string, len(iptablesPathsToTry))
|
||||
for _, pathToTest := range iptablesPathsToTry {
|
||||
ok, unsupportedMessage, err := testIptablesPath(ctx, pathToTest, runner)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
@@ -29,19 +30,37 @@ func checkIptablesSupport(ctx context.Context, runner command.Runner,
|
||||
iptablesPath = pathToTest
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lastUnsupportedMessage = unsupportedMessage
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if iptablesPath == "" { // all iptables to try failed
|
||||
return "", fmt.Errorf("%w: from %s: last error is: %s",
|
||||
ErrIPTablesNotSupported, strings.Join(iptablesPathsToTry, ", "),
|
||||
lastUnsupportedMessage)
|
||||
iptablesPathToUnsupportedMessage[pathToTest] = unsupportedMessage
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if iptablesPath != "" {
|
||||
// some paths may be unsupported but that does not matter
|
||||
// since we found one working.
|
||||
return iptablesPath, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
allArePermissionDenied := true
|
||||
allUnsupportedMessages := make(sort.StringSlice, 0, len(iptablesPathToUnsupportedMessage))
|
||||
for iptablesPath, unsupportedMessage := range iptablesPathToUnsupportedMessage {
|
||||
if !isPermissionDenied(unsupportedMessage) {
|
||||
allArePermissionDenied = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsupportedMessage = iptablesPath + ": " + unsupportedMessage
|
||||
allUnsupportedMessages = append(allUnsupportedMessages, unsupportedMessage)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
allUnsupportedMessages.Sort() // predictable order for tests
|
||||
|
||||
if allArePermissionDenied {
|
||||
// If the error is related to a denied permission for all iptables path,
|
||||
// return an error describing what to do from an end-user perspective.
|
||||
return "", fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrNetAdminMissing, strings.Join(allUnsupportedMessages, "; "))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return "", fmt.Errorf("%w: errors encountered are: %s",
|
||||
ErrIPTablesNotSupported, strings.Join(allUnsupportedMessages, "; "))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func testIptablesPath(ctx context.Context, path string,
|
||||
runner command.Runner) (ok bool, unsupportedMessage string,
|
||||
criticalErr error) {
|
||||
@@ -56,14 +75,6 @@ func testIptablesPath(ctx context.Context, path string,
|
||||
"-A", "OUTPUT", "-o", testInterfaceName, "-j", "DROP")
|
||||
output, err := runner.Run(cmd)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
if isPermissionDenied(output) {
|
||||
// If the error is related to a denied permission,
|
||||
// return an error describing what to do from an end-user
|
||||
// perspective. This is a critical error and likely
|
||||
// applies to all iptables.
|
||||
criticalErr = fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrNetAdminMissing, output)
|
||||
return false, "", criticalErr
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsupportedMessage = fmt.Sprintf("%s (%s)", output, err)
|
||||
return false, unsupportedMessage, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -84,10 +95,6 @@ func testIptablesPath(ctx context.Context, path string,
|
||||
cmd = exec.CommandContext(ctx, path, "-L", "INPUT")
|
||||
output, err = runner.Run(cmd)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
if isPermissionDenied(output) {
|
||||
criticalErr = fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrNetAdminMissing, output)
|
||||
return false, "", criticalErr
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsupportedMessage = fmt.Sprintf("%s (%s)", output, err)
|
||||
return false, unsupportedMessage, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -109,10 +116,6 @@ func testIptablesPath(ctx context.Context, path string,
|
||||
cmd = exec.CommandContext(ctx, path, "--policy", "INPUT", inputPolicy)
|
||||
output, err = runner.Run(cmd)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
if isPermissionDenied(output) {
|
||||
criticalErr = fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrNetAdminMissing, output)
|
||||
return false, "", criticalErr
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsupportedMessage = fmt.Sprintf("%s (%s)", output, err)
|
||||
return false, unsupportedMessage, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,10 +8,130 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/golang/mock/gomock"
|
||||
"github.com/qdm12/golibs/command"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
//go:generate mockgen -destination=runner_mock_test.go -package $GOPACKAGE github.com/qdm12/golibs/command Runner
|
||||
|
||||
func newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path string) *cmdMatcher {
|
||||
return newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^-A$", "^OUTPUT$", "^-o$", "^[a-z0-9]{15}$",
|
||||
"^-j$", "^DROP$")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path string) *cmdMatcher {
|
||||
return newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^-D$", "^OUTPUT$", "^-o$", "^[a-z0-9]{15}$",
|
||||
"^-j$", "^DROP$")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func newListInputRulesMatcher(path string) *cmdMatcher {
|
||||
return newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^-L$", "^INPUT$")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func newSetPolicyMatcher(path, inputPolicy string) *cmdMatcher { //nolint:unparam
|
||||
return newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^--policy$", "^INPUT$", "^"+inputPolicy+"$")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_checkIptablesSupport(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
|
||||
ctx := context.Background()
|
||||
errDummy := errors.New("exit code 4")
|
||||
const inputPolicy = "ACCEPT"
|
||||
|
||||
testCases := map[string]struct {
|
||||
buildRunner func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner
|
||||
iptablesPathsToTry []string
|
||||
iptablesPath string
|
||||
errSentinel error
|
||||
errMessage string
|
||||
}{
|
||||
"critical error when checking": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("output", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
iptablesPathsToTry: []string{"path1", "path2"},
|
||||
errSentinel: ErrTestRuleCleanup,
|
||||
errMessage: "for path1: failed cleaning up test rule: " +
|
||||
"output (exit code 4)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"found valid path": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("Chain INPUT (policy "+inputPolicy+")", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newSetPolicyMatcher("path1", inputPolicy)).
|
||||
Return("", nil)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
iptablesPathsToTry: []string{"path1", "path2"},
|
||||
iptablesPath: "path1",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"all permission denied": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("Permission denied (you must be root) more context", errDummy)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher("path2")).
|
||||
Return("context: Permission denied (you must be root)", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
iptablesPathsToTry: []string{"path1", "path2"},
|
||||
errSentinel: ErrNetAdminMissing,
|
||||
errMessage: "NET_ADMIN capability is missing: " +
|
||||
"path1: Permission denied (you must be root) more context (exit code 4); " +
|
||||
"path2: context: Permission denied (you must be root) (exit code 4)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"no valid path": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher("path1")).
|
||||
Return("output 1", errDummy)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher("path2")).
|
||||
Return("output 2", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
iptablesPathsToTry: []string{"path1", "path2"},
|
||||
errSentinel: ErrIPTablesNotSupported,
|
||||
errMessage: "no iptables supported found: " +
|
||||
"errors encountered are: " +
|
||||
"path1: output 1 (exit code 4); " +
|
||||
"path2: output 2 (exit code 4)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for name, testCase := range testCases {
|
||||
testCase := testCase
|
||||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
|
||||
|
||||
runner := testCase.buildRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
|
||||
iptablesPath, err :=
|
||||
checkIptablesSupport(ctx, runner, testCase.iptablesPathsToTry...)
|
||||
|
||||
require.ErrorIs(t, err, testCase.errSentinel)
|
||||
if testCase.errSentinel != nil {
|
||||
assert.EqualError(t, err, testCase.errMessage)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, testCase.iptablesPath, iptablesPath)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,17 +140,6 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
errDummy := errors.New("exit code 4")
|
||||
const inputPolicy = "ACCEPT"
|
||||
|
||||
appendTestRuleMatcher := newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^-A$", "^OUTPUT$", "^-o$", "^[a-z0-9]{15}$",
|
||||
"^-j$", "^DROP$")
|
||||
deleteTestRuleMatcher := newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^-D$", "^OUTPUT$", "^-o$", "^[a-z0-9]{15}$",
|
||||
"^-j$", "^DROP$")
|
||||
listInputRulesMatcher := newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^-L$", "^INPUT$")
|
||||
setPolicyMatcher := newCmdMatcher(path,
|
||||
"^--policy$", "^INPUT$", "^"+inputPolicy+"$")
|
||||
|
||||
testCases := map[string]struct {
|
||||
buildRunner func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner
|
||||
ok bool
|
||||
@@ -41,18 +150,16 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"append test rule permission denied": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("Permission denied (you must be root)", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
criticalErrWrapped: ErrNetAdminMissing,
|
||||
criticalErrMessage: "NET_ADMIN capability is missing: " +
|
||||
"Permission denied (you must be root)",
|
||||
unsupportedMessage: "Permission denied (you must be root) (exit code 4)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"append test rule unsupported": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("some output", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -61,8 +168,8 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"remove test rule error": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("some output", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -72,22 +179,20 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"list input rules permission denied": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(listInputRulesMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("Permission denied (you must be root)", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
criticalErrWrapped: ErrNetAdminMissing,
|
||||
criticalErrMessage: "NET_ADMIN capability is missing: " +
|
||||
"Permission denied (you must be root)",
|
||||
unsupportedMessage: "Permission denied (you must be root) (exit code 4)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"list input rules unsupported": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(listInputRulesMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("some output", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -96,9 +201,9 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"list input rules no policy": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(listInputRulesMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("some\noutput", nil)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -108,26 +213,24 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"set policy permission denied": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(listInputRulesMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("\nChain INPUT (policy "+inputPolicy+")\nxx\n", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(setPolicyMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newSetPolicyMatcher(path, inputPolicy)).
|
||||
Return("Permission denied (you must be root)", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
criticalErrWrapped: ErrNetAdminMissing,
|
||||
criticalErrMessage: "NET_ADMIN capability is missing: " +
|
||||
"Permission denied (you must be root)",
|
||||
unsupportedMessage: "Permission denied (you must be root) (exit code 4)",
|
||||
},
|
||||
"set policy unsupported": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(listInputRulesMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("\nChain INPUT (policy "+inputPolicy+")\nxx\n", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(setPolicyMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newSetPolicyMatcher(path, inputPolicy)).
|
||||
Return("some output", errDummy)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -136,11 +239,12 @@ func Test_testIptablesPath(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
"success": {
|
||||
buildRunner: func(ctrl *gomock.Controller) command.Runner {
|
||||
runner := NewMockRunner(ctrl)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(appendTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(deleteTestRuleMatcher).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(listInputRulesMatcher).
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newAppendTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newDeleteTestRuleMatcher(path)).Return("", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newListInputRulesMatcher(path)).
|
||||
Return("\nChain INPUT (policy "+inputPolicy+")\nxx\n", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(setPolicyMatcher).Return("some output", nil)
|
||||
runner.EXPECT().Run(newSetPolicyMatcher(path, inputPolicy)).
|
||||
Return("some output", nil)
|
||||
return runner
|
||||
},
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user