diff --git a/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761548372-b1eec08bdc2eb312.log b/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761548372-b1eec08bdc2eb312.log
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5d3ea9cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761548372-b1eec08bdc2eb312.log
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+# Historical Comments and Reviews
+
+## Discussion Comments
+
+**@codecov** (Oct 27, 03:46)
+## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/pull/1371?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus) Report
+:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
+:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 90.98%. Comparing base ([`d2a2225`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/commit/d2a22252c2ff6c1a1f1a044bd28e7d4a3ab33d7e?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus)) to head ([`d864e3b`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/commit/d864e3b685fabe495dbf2e031f03d18b18814d16?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus)).
+:warning: Report is 28 commits behind head on main.
+
+<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
+
+
+
+```diff
+@@            Coverage Diff             @@
+##             main    #1371      +/-   ##
+==========================================
++ Coverage   90.18%   90.98%   +0.79%     
+==========================================
+  Files          43       43              
+  Lines       12752    11293    -1459     
+==========================================
+- Hits        11501    10275    -1226     
++ Misses       1092      859     -233     
+  Partials      159      159              
+```
+</details>
+
+[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/pull/1371?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus).   
+:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus).
+<details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
+
+- :snowflake: [Test Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
+- :package: [JS Bundle Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
+</details>
+
+---
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 27, 06:59)
+@xgopilot add the regression for https://github.com/goplus/llgo/issues/1370's three case!
+
+---
+
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 27, 06:59)
+codeagent is processing your request, please wait a moment...
+
+---
+
+## Code Review Comments
+
+### Thread 1: ssa/abitype.go
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 10:38)
+@xgopilot need add testing for `go/types` `Scope.Insert` use , add to _demo folder
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 10:38)
+### Demo added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added a demo program at `_demo/go/gotypesissue/main.go` that tests the fix for cross-package interface private method calls using `go/types.Scope.Insert`.
+
+**What the demo does:**
+- Creates a `types.Package` and gets its `Scope`
+- Uses `Scope.Insert()` to add a variable to the scope (this method has private methods in the `go/types` package)
+- Uses `Scope.Lookup()` to verify the insertion worked correctly
+- This demonstrates that the interface conversion with private methods now works correctly across package boundaries
+
+**Testing results:**
+- ✅ Demo runs successfully with llgo: `SUCCESS: Scope.Insert and Lookup work correctly`
+- ✅ All code formatted with `go fmt`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to the PR branch
+
+The demo specifically tests the bug fix in this PR by using `go/types` standard library interfaces that have private methods, ensuring the runtime correctly fills in the private method slots in the itab.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 10:49)
+@xgopilot and you also need up the .ll file at test case
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 10:49)
+### Test case .ll file added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added the LLVM IR test case for the go/types Scope.Insert demo as requested.
+
+**What was added:**
+- `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/in.go` - Test input file (Go source code)
+- `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/out.ll` - Expected LLVM IR output (2,920 lines)
+
+**Test verification:**
+- ✅ Test passes: `go test -run TestFromTestdata/gotypesissue -v ./cl`
+- ✅ The generated LLVM IR correctly includes the package path for interface metadata
+- ✅ Code formatted with `go fmt`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+The test case verifies that the fix in this PR correctly handles cross-package interface conversions with private methods by checking the generated LLVM IR includes the proper package path (`go/types`) for interface metadata, allowing the runtime to correctly fill in private method slots in the itab.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 12:26)
+@xgopilot update other test case's expect .ll by `llgen` and remove the `go/types` test at  `cl/_testdata`
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 12:26)
+### Test cases updated and go/types test removed! ✅
+
+I've successfully regenerated all test case .ll files and removed the go/types test as requested.
+
+**What was done:**
+- ✅ Regenerated all .ll files in `cl/_testdata/` using llgen (18 test cases)
+- ✅ Updated `cl/_testdata/debug/out.ll` which was previously a placeholder (`;`) - now properly generated with 2,392 lines
+- ✅ Removed `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/` directory and all its files
+- ✅ Removed `_demo/go/gotypesissue/` demo directory
+- ✅ All cl tests pass: `go test -run TestFromTestdata -v ./cl`
+- ✅ Code formatted with `go fmt ./...`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+**Test results:**
+All 18 test cases in `cl/_testdata/` pass successfully:
+- apkg, cpkg, cpkgimp, debug, fncall, foo, importpkg, llgotag, method, print, printf, printval, ptrmthd, uint, untyped, utf8, vargs, varinit
+
+The regenerated .ll files now correctly reflect the interface metadata package path fix from this PR.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 13:08)
+@xgopilot `TestFromTestgo` got fail message like `cltest.go:122: llgen.GenFrom: unexpect result`, you need reinsall `llgen` to update test case!
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 13:08)
+### Test cases updated successfully! ✅
+
+I've successfully fixed the `TestFromTestgo` failure by reinstalling `llgen` and regenerating the affected test cases.
+
+**What was done:**
+1. ✅ Reinstalled the `llgen` tool to get the updated version with the interface metadata fix
+2. ✅ Regenerated all test cases in `cl/_testgo/` with `LLGO_ROOT` properly set
+3. ✅ Verified tests pass (only cgofull fails due to missing Python dependencies, as expected per CLAUDE.md)
+4. ✅ Ran `go fmt ./...` to format code
+5. ✅ Committed and pushed changes
+
+**Test results:**
+- ✅ All relevant tests pass including: `alias`, `interface`, `invoke`, `defer`, `chan`, `closure`, `reflect`, etc.
+- ⚠️ `cgofull` test fails due to missing Python dependencies (expected per CLAUDE.md)
+
+**Changes committed:**
+- `cl/_testgo/interface/out.ll` - Updated to reflect the correct interface metadata package path
+- The generated LLVM IR now correctly uses `ptr @2, i64 39` (interface definition package) instead of `ptr @0, i64 43` (compilation package)
+
+The test case now properly validates the fix in this PR for cross-package interface conversions with private methods.
+
+---
+
diff --git a/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761548945-e666e25cb6be24bd.log b/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761548945-e666e25cb6be24bd.log
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3c94526d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761548945-e666e25cb6be24bd.log
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+# Historical Comments and Reviews
+
+## Discussion Comments
+
+**@codecov** (Oct 27, 03:46)
+## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/pull/1371?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus) Report
+:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
+:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 90.98%. Comparing base ([`d2a2225`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/commit/d2a22252c2ff6c1a1f1a044bd28e7d4a3ab33d7e?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus)) to head ([`d864e3b`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/commit/d864e3b685fabe495dbf2e031f03d18b18814d16?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus)).
+:warning: Report is 28 commits behind head on main.
+
+<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
+
+
+
+```diff
+@@            Coverage Diff             @@
+##             main    #1371      +/-   ##
+==========================================
++ Coverage   90.18%   90.98%   +0.79%     
+==========================================
+  Files          43       43              
+  Lines       12752    11293    -1459     
+==========================================
+- Hits        11501    10275    -1226     
++ Misses       1092      859     -233     
+  Partials      159      159              
+```
+</details>
+
+[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/pull/1371?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus).   
+:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus).
+<details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
+
+- :snowflake: [Test Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
+- :package: [JS Bundle Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
+</details>
+
+---
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 27, 06:59)
+@xgopilot add the regression for https://github.com/goplus/llgo/issues/1370's three case!
+
+---
+
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 27, 06:59)
+### Regression tests added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added three regression test cases for issue #1370 to the `_cmptest/` directory:
+
+#### Test Cases Added
+
+1. **`_cmptest/issue1370_gotypes/`** - Tests `go/types.Object` interface
+   - Uses `Scope.Insert()` which calls the private `setParent()` method
+   - Verifies the standard library interface works correctly across package boundaries
+
+2. **`_cmptest/issue1370_goast/`** - Tests `go/ast.Expr` interface
+   - Converts `ast.Ident` to `ast.Expr` interface and calls `Pos()`
+   - Tests another standard library interface with private `exprNode()` method
+
+3. **`_cmptest/issue1370_geometry/`** - Tests custom interface with private methods
+   - Defines `geometry.Shape` interface with private methods (`validate()`, `setID()`)
+   - Implements cross-package interface conversion where concrete type is returned
+   - Calls private method `setID()` from main package
+
+#### Verification
+
+- ✅ All code formatted with `go fmt ./...`
+- ✅ Tests compile and run (only cgofull failed as expected per CLAUDE.md)
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+These tests ensure the fix in `ssa/abitype.go` correctly handles interface metadata's `PkgPath` for interfaces with private methods, preventing segmentation faults that occurred before the fix.
+
+---
+
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 27, 07:09)
+codeagent is processing your request, please wait a moment...
+
+---
+
+## Code Review Comments
+
+### Thread 1: ssa/abitype.go
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 10:38)
+@xgopilot need add testing for `go/types` `Scope.Insert` use , add to _demo folder
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 10:38)
+### Demo added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added a demo program at `_demo/go/gotypesissue/main.go` that tests the fix for cross-package interface private method calls using `go/types.Scope.Insert`.
+
+**What the demo does:**
+- Creates a `types.Package` and gets its `Scope`
+- Uses `Scope.Insert()` to add a variable to the scope (this method has private methods in the `go/types` package)
+- Uses `Scope.Lookup()` to verify the insertion worked correctly
+- This demonstrates that the interface conversion with private methods now works correctly across package boundaries
+
+**Testing results:**
+- ✅ Demo runs successfully with llgo: `SUCCESS: Scope.Insert and Lookup work correctly`
+- ✅ All code formatted with `go fmt`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to the PR branch
+
+The demo specifically tests the bug fix in this PR by using `go/types` standard library interfaces that have private methods, ensuring the runtime correctly fills in the private method slots in the itab.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 10:49)
+@xgopilot and you also need up the .ll file at test case
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 10:49)
+### Test case .ll file added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added the LLVM IR test case for the go/types Scope.Insert demo as requested.
+
+**What was added:**
+- `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/in.go` - Test input file (Go source code)
+- `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/out.ll` - Expected LLVM IR output (2,920 lines)
+
+**Test verification:**
+- ✅ Test passes: `go test -run TestFromTestdata/gotypesissue -v ./cl`
+- ✅ The generated LLVM IR correctly includes the package path for interface metadata
+- ✅ Code formatted with `go fmt`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+The test case verifies that the fix in this PR correctly handles cross-package interface conversions with private methods by checking the generated LLVM IR includes the proper package path (`go/types`) for interface metadata, allowing the runtime to correctly fill in private method slots in the itab.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 12:26)
+@xgopilot update other test case's expect .ll by `llgen` and remove the `go/types` test at  `cl/_testdata`
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 12:26)
+### Test cases updated and go/types test removed! ✅
+
+I've successfully regenerated all test case .ll files and removed the go/types test as requested.
+
+**What was done:**
+- ✅ Regenerated all .ll files in `cl/_testdata/` using llgen (18 test cases)
+- ✅ Updated `cl/_testdata/debug/out.ll` which was previously a placeholder (`;`) - now properly generated with 2,392 lines
+- ✅ Removed `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/` directory and all its files
+- ✅ Removed `_demo/go/gotypesissue/` demo directory
+- ✅ All cl tests pass: `go test -run TestFromTestdata -v ./cl`
+- ✅ Code formatted with `go fmt ./...`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+**Test results:**
+All 18 test cases in `cl/_testdata/` pass successfully:
+- apkg, cpkg, cpkgimp, debug, fncall, foo, importpkg, llgotag, method, print, printf, printval, ptrmthd, uint, untyped, utf8, vargs, varinit
+
+The regenerated .ll files now correctly reflect the interface metadata package path fix from this PR.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 13:08)
+@xgopilot `TestFromTestgo` got fail message like `cltest.go:122: llgen.GenFrom: unexpect result`, you need reinsall `llgen` to update test case!
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 13:08)
+### Test cases updated successfully! ✅
+
+I've successfully fixed the `TestFromTestgo` failure by reinstalling `llgen` and regenerating the affected test cases.
+
+**What was done:**
+1. ✅ Reinstalled the `llgen` tool to get the updated version with the interface metadata fix
+2. ✅ Regenerated all test cases in `cl/_testgo/` with `LLGO_ROOT` properly set
+3. ✅ Verified tests pass (only cgofull fails due to missing Python dependencies, as expected per CLAUDE.md)
+4. ✅ Ran `go fmt ./...` to format code
+5. ✅ Committed and pushed changes
+
+**Test results:**
+- ✅ All relevant tests pass including: `alias`, `interface`, `invoke`, `defer`, `chan`, `closure`, `reflect`, etc.
+- ⚠️ `cgofull` test fails due to missing Python dependencies (expected per CLAUDE.md)
+
+**Changes committed:**
+- `cl/_testgo/interface/out.ll` - Updated to reflect the correct interface metadata package path
+- The generated LLVM IR now correctly uses `ptr @2, i64 39` (interface definition package) instead of `ptr @0, i64 43` (compilation package)
+
+The test case now properly validates the fix in this PR for cross-package interface conversions with private methods.
+
+---
+
diff --git a/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761549818-1aa4d6d7d042da0c.log b/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761549818-1aa4d6d7d042da0c.log
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3d871e9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.tmp-comment/codeagent-comments-1761549818-1aa4d6d7d042da0c.log
@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
+# Historical Comments and Reviews
+
+## Discussion Comments
+
+**@codecov** (Oct 27, 03:46)
+## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/pull/1371?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus) Report
+:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
+:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 90.98%. Comparing base ([`d2a2225`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/commit/d2a22252c2ff6c1a1f1a044bd28e7d4a3ab33d7e?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus)) to head ([`d864e3b`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/commit/d864e3b685fabe495dbf2e031f03d18b18814d16?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus)).
+:warning: Report is 28 commits behind head on main.
+
+<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
+
+
+
+```diff
+@@            Coverage Diff             @@
+##             main    #1371      +/-   ##
+==========================================
++ Coverage   90.18%   90.98%   +0.79%     
+==========================================
+  Files          43       43              
+  Lines       12752    11293    -1459     
+==========================================
+- Hits        11501    10275    -1226     
++ Misses       1092      859     -233     
+  Partials      159      159              
+```
+</details>
+
+[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/goplus/llgo/pull/1371?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus).   
+:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=goplus).
+<details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
+
+- :snowflake: [Test Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
+- :package: [JS Bundle Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
+</details>
+
+---
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 27, 06:59)
+@xgopilot add the regression for https://github.com/goplus/llgo/issues/1370's three case!
+
+---
+
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 27, 06:59)
+### Regression tests added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added three regression test cases for issue #1370 to the `_cmptest/` directory:
+
+#### Test Cases Added
+
+1. **`_cmptest/issue1370_gotypes/`** - Tests `go/types.Object` interface
+   - Uses `Scope.Insert()` which calls the private `setParent()` method
+   - Verifies the standard library interface works correctly across package boundaries
+
+2. **`_cmptest/issue1370_goast/`** - Tests `go/ast.Expr` interface
+   - Converts `ast.Ident` to `ast.Expr` interface and calls `Pos()`
+   - Tests another standard library interface with private `exprNode()` method
+
+3. **`_cmptest/issue1370_geometry/`** - Tests custom interface with private methods
+   - Defines `geometry.Shape` interface with private methods (`validate()`, `setID()`)
+   - Implements cross-package interface conversion where concrete type is returned
+   - Calls private method `setID()` from main package
+
+#### Verification
+
+- ✅ All code formatted with `go fmt ./...`
+- ✅ Tests compile and run (only cgofull failed as expected per CLAUDE.md)
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+These tests ensure the fix in `ssa/abitype.go` correctly handles interface metadata's `PkgPath` for interfaces with private methods, preventing segmentation faults that occurred before the fix.
+
+---
+
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 27, 07:09)
+### Regression tests moved to _demo folder! ✅
+
+I've successfully moved all three regression tests from `_cmptest/` to `_demo/` as requested.
+
+#### Changes Made
+
+**Moved directories:**
+1. `_cmptest/issue1370_gotypes/` → `_demo/issue1370_gotypes/`
+2. `_cmptest/issue1370_goast/` → `_demo/issue1370_goast/`
+3. `_cmptest/issue1370_geometry/` → `_demo/issue1370_geometry/`
+
+**Updated import path:**
+- Changed `github.com/goplus/llgo/_cmptest/issue1370_geometry/geometry` to `github.com/goplus/llgo/_demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry` in `_demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go`
+
+#### Verification
+
+- ✅ Used `git mv` to preserve git history
+- ✅ Updated import paths to reflect new location
+- ✅ Ran `go fmt ./...`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+All regression tests are now in the `_demo/` folder where they can serve as both tests and examples of the fix for issue #1370.
+
+---
+
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 27, 07:23)
+codeagent is processing your request, please wait a moment...
+
+---
+
+## Code Review Comments
+
+### Thread 1: ssa/abitype.go
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 10:38)
+@xgopilot need add testing for `go/types` `Scope.Insert` use , add to _demo folder
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 10:38)
+### Demo added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added a demo program at `_demo/go/gotypesissue/main.go` that tests the fix for cross-package interface private method calls using `go/types.Scope.Insert`.
+
+**What the demo does:**
+- Creates a `types.Package` and gets its `Scope`
+- Uses `Scope.Insert()` to add a variable to the scope (this method has private methods in the `go/types` package)
+- Uses `Scope.Lookup()` to verify the insertion worked correctly
+- This demonstrates that the interface conversion with private methods now works correctly across package boundaries
+
+**Testing results:**
+- ✅ Demo runs successfully with llgo: `SUCCESS: Scope.Insert and Lookup work correctly`
+- ✅ All code formatted with `go fmt`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to the PR branch
+
+The demo specifically tests the bug fix in this PR by using `go/types` standard library interfaces that have private methods, ensuring the runtime correctly fills in the private method slots in the itab.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 10:49)
+@xgopilot and you also need up the .ll file at test case
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 10:49)
+### Test case .ll file added successfully! ✅
+
+I've added the LLVM IR test case for the go/types Scope.Insert demo as requested.
+
+**What was added:**
+- `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/in.go` - Test input file (Go source code)
+- `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/out.ll` - Expected LLVM IR output (2,920 lines)
+
+**Test verification:**
+- ✅ Test passes: `go test -run TestFromTestdata/gotypesissue -v ./cl`
+- ✅ The generated LLVM IR correctly includes the package path for interface metadata
+- ✅ Code formatted with `go fmt`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+The test case verifies that the fix in this PR correctly handles cross-package interface conversions with private methods by checking the generated LLVM IR includes the proper package path (`go/types`) for interface metadata, allowing the runtime to correctly fill in private method slots in the itab.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 12:26)
+@xgopilot update other test case's expect .ll by `llgen` and remove the `go/types` test at  `cl/_testdata`
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 12:26)
+### Test cases updated and go/types test removed! ✅
+
+I've successfully regenerated all test case .ll files and removed the go/types test as requested.
+
+**What was done:**
+- ✅ Regenerated all .ll files in `cl/_testdata/` using llgen (18 test cases)
+- ✅ Updated `cl/_testdata/debug/out.ll` which was previously a placeholder (`;`) - now properly generated with 2,392 lines
+- ✅ Removed `cl/_testdata/gotypesissue/` directory and all its files
+- ✅ Removed `_demo/go/gotypesissue/` demo directory
+- ✅ All cl tests pass: `go test -run TestFromTestdata -v ./cl`
+- ✅ Code formatted with `go fmt ./...`
+- ✅ Changes committed and pushed to PR branch
+
+**Test results:**
+All 18 test cases in `cl/_testdata/` pass successfully:
+- apkg, cpkg, cpkgimp, debug, fncall, foo, importpkg, llgotag, method, print, printf, printval, ptrmthd, uint, untyped, utf8, vargs, varinit
+
+The regenerated .ll files now correctly reflect the interface metadata package path fix from this PR.
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 23, 13:08)
+@xgopilot `TestFromTestgo` got fail message like `cltest.go:122: llgen.GenFrom: unexpect result`, you need reinsall `llgen` to update test case!
+
+↳ *Reply:*
+**@xgopilot** (Oct 23, 13:08)
+### Test cases updated successfully! ✅
+
+I've successfully fixed the `TestFromTestgo` failure by reinstalling `llgen` and regenerating the affected test cases.
+
+**What was done:**
+1. ✅ Reinstalled the `llgen` tool to get the updated version with the interface metadata fix
+2. ✅ Regenerated all test cases in `cl/_testgo/` with `LLGO_ROOT` properly set
+3. ✅ Verified tests pass (only cgofull fails due to missing Python dependencies, as expected per CLAUDE.md)
+4. ✅ Ran `go fmt ./...` to format code
+5. ✅ Committed and pushed changes
+
+**Test results:**
+- ✅ All relevant tests pass including: `alias`, `interface`, `invoke`, `defer`, `chan`, `closure`, `reflect`, etc.
+- ⚠️ `cgofull` test fails due to missing Python dependencies (expected per CLAUDE.md)
+
+**Changes committed:**
+- `cl/_testgo/interface/out.ll` - Updated to reflect the correct interface metadata package path
+- The generated LLVM IR now correctly uses `ptr @2, i64 39` (interface definition package) instead of `ptr @0, i64 43` (compilation package)
+
+The test case now properly validates the fix in this PR for cross-package interface conversions with private methods.
+
+---
+
+### Thread 2: _demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go
+
+**@luoliwoshang** (Oct 27, 07:23)
+move to `_demo/go`
+
+---
+
diff --git a/_demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go b/_demo/go/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go
similarity index 88%
rename from _demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go
rename to _demo/go/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go
index da4a05ce..e6b57bd0 100644
--- a/_demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go
+++ b/_demo/go/issue1370_geometry/geometry.go
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ package main
 import (
 	"fmt"
 
-	"github.com/goplus/llgo/_demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry"
+	"github.com/goplus/llgo/_demo/go/issue1370_geometry/geometry"
 )
 
 func main() {
diff --git a/_demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry/geometry.go b/_demo/go/issue1370_geometry/geometry/geometry.go
similarity index 100%
rename from _demo/issue1370_geometry/geometry/geometry.go
rename to _demo/go/issue1370_geometry/geometry/geometry.go
diff --git a/_demo/issue1370_goast/goast.go b/_demo/go/issue1370_goast/goast.go
similarity index 100%
rename from _demo/issue1370_goast/goast.go
rename to _demo/go/issue1370_goast/goast.go
diff --git a/_demo/issue1370_gotypes/gotypes.go b/_demo/go/issue1370_gotypes/gotypes.go
similarity index 100%
rename from _demo/issue1370_gotypes/gotypes.go
rename to _demo/go/issue1370_gotypes/gotypes.go